Watch for Motorcycles: May is Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month

Did you know that 62% of motorcycle fatalities occur between May and September? Why is that? May is National Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month for a reason. Favorable weather conditions and a desire to be outdoors encourage motorcyclists to reoccupy their equitable share of the open road by joining other motorists in route to their desired destinations. While motorcyclists are entitled to the same rights and consideration granted to drivers of four-wheeled vehicles, the majority of vehicles on the road are not motorcycles. Right or wrong, most drivers rarely think of motorcyclists as drivers (not unlike themselves) that must be regarded with the same caution and deference as other motorists.

This is a problem.

Motorists concerned solely with their own vehicle—and vehicles like theirs—still bear a substantial responsibility in maintaining the safety of motorcyclists on the road. When motorcycles and four-wheeled vehicles collide, predominately it is the driver of the non-motorcycle vehicle who violates the motorcyclists’ right of way. There are a variety of reasons why motorcycles are discounted. Being mindful of these routine conditions may prevent the next motorcycle fatality or serious injury from occurring:  

  • Motorcycles are smaller relative to other vehicles
  • Motorists sometimes fail to anticipate a motorcycle’s movements
  • Motorists’ view of a motorcyclist is sometimes blocked by their own vehicle’s blind spots or by the presence of other vehicles
  • Motorists are sometimes distracted while driving

National Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month was created in recognition of the hazards that drivers of all vehicles encounter when defensive driving, environmental awareness, and vigilant alertness are abandoned in favor of distraction and recklessness. The aim of Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month is to remind drivers and riders that they share equal responsibility for each other’s safety. Driving defensively and free of distraction means:

  • Putting cell phones away until the vehicle is no longer in motion
  • Keeping one’s eyes on the road at all times when the vehicle is operational
  • Using turn signals when switching lanes, repositioning, or changing direction
  • Acknowledging the right of way of other vehicles when necessary
  • Being aware of the surrounding environment

If drivers and riders pledge to defend common courtesy and regard for all motorists, America’s roadways will be the cathartic and liberating place where drivers and riders can revel in their abandon and passion for the open road.

Ride on.

If you or someone your care for has suffered an injury due to a motorcycle collision, please contact the experienced, compassionate professionals at Inserra | Kelley | Sewell, Injury Attorneys. Safeguarding motorists’ wellbeing and quality of life is our passion. We want to protect your right to compensation for your injuries.

Do I Have Another Claim Besides Workers’ Compensation?

If another party’s thoughtless or reckless actions caused your injury, you could have a workers’ compensation claim and a third party personal injury claim at your disposal.

Most injury sufferers fail to recognize the intricate complexity of the incident that resulted in their pain and suffering. Specifically, the most critical factor an injured person often overlooks is that their workers’ compensation claim (or personal injury claim) might actually be both. Misinterpreting what kind of claim you have, how many claims you have, and the values of those claims is highly detrimental to an injured individual’s opportunity to pursue compensation for the damages they’ve incurred.

Imagine this—your boss sends you on an afternoon errand to FedEx to drop-off a package. On your way to the FedEx shop you are involved in a collision. The driver of the vehicle that collided with you and caused your injuries is responsible for the accident and liable for damages. Simple, right? Wrong. The aforementioned scenario is deceptively basic, and yet it is a perfect example of how an injured individual could mistake an ordinary injury collision as a single claim instead of an incident that encompasses both spectrums of workers’ compensation claims and personal injury simultaneously.

If you think that you or someone you know was involved in an incident that resulted in personal injury, but you are unsure of how many claims (or what kind of claim) you have, please do not hesitate to contact Inserra Kelley Sewell, Personal Injury Attorneys. Our dedicated team of attorneys and legal professionals can help you determine– not just the value of your claim—but how many claims you actually have. Unfortunately, too many injury sufferers underestimate the amount of red tape and hoops they have to jump through when they try to take on insurance companies on their own. Our primary goal at Inserra | Kelley | Sewell, Injury Attorneys is to take the worry off your shoulders by doing the hard work for you. If you’re David versus Goliath (in a fight for your right to seek fair compensation for your injuries), it helps to have an experienced legal team in your corner to yield the best possible outcome and to maximize your profits.

I Am Injured. Now What? Should I File a Workers’ Compensation Claim or a Personal Injury Lawsuit?

When you are injured as a direct result of someone else’s negligence, it can be problematic to discern in which category—workers’ compensation or personal injury—the incident belongs. Educating yourself about the primary differences between the two could alleviate some of the disorienting and puzzling questions that abound when you are injured and don’t know what steps to take next.   

Personal Injury Lawsuit Overview

Unlike workers’ compensation claims, personal injury lawsuits are not specific to a subcategory of people or situations. Anyone who suffers an injury triggered by an at-fault party has the right to file a personal injury lawsuit. To recover damages, however, the injured individual must provide sufficient evidence to support their claim that the other party is responsible for their injury. In addition, the injured party must substantiate the validity and monetary value of their claim by specifying the amount of damage incurred to either their property, physical functionality, psychological health, and/or earning capacity (due to lost wages, time off work, or medical incapacitation).

While personal injury demands are chiefly compensation based, the injured party also has the right to seek payment for the emotional distress they’ve endured. When an injured person is deprived of their right to live a full life due to a physically debilitating injury, that in turn inhibits their psychological, emotional, and spiritual well-being. Therefore, if applicable, plaintiffs may also demand settlement for “pain and suffering” (in addition to the more prevalent demands for medical expenses, property damage, lost wages, and loss of future earning capacity that injured parties typically request).

Workers’ Compensation Overview

Workers’ compensation benefits are available to a worker who is injured in the scope of their employment, and no evidence of fault must be provided in order for benefits to be dispensed. The only stipulations of a workers’ compensation claim that must be established are: (a) that the injury was sustained while working and (b) that the injury is associated with the duties the worker executes.

Through workers’ compensation, an injured employee receives: non-taxable income compensation of an amount equivalent to approximately two-thirds of their weekly or bi-weekly wage earnings, medical care, recompense for permanent damage, and reimbursement for essential position retraining.

Commonly Overlooked Areas of Overlap

Workers’ compensation can yield monetary rewards to injured individuals that were working when the injury occurred. However, there are frequently ignored situations in which an injured employee would benefit from pursuing a personal injury claim as well:

  • A product defect is responsible for the injury and a products liability lawsuit could be filed against the manufacturer
  • A toxic substance is responsible for the injury and a toxic tort lawsuit could be filed against the manufacturer
  • An injury occurs in a workplace setting in which the employer is not mandated to carry workers’ compensation insurance OR the employer has failed to comply with the mandate
  • An employer or fellow worker intentionally causes an injury
  • An injury is suffered because of the negligence of a third party, someone other than an employer or a fellow worker

If you (or someone you know) has been injured and you are unsure of what kind of claim you may have, please do not hesitate to contact Inserra Kelley Sewell, Personal Injury Attorneys. Our dedicated team of attorneys and legal professionals can help you determine– not just the value of your claim—but how many claims you actually have. Unfortunately, too many injury sufferers underestimate the intricate complexity of the incident that resulted in their painful circumstances. Our primary goal at Inserra | Kelley | Sewell, Injury Attorneys is to lead you through the baffling maze of personal injury litigation so that you can focus on healing, recovery, and a return to living a full, balanced life.

Vuse Brand of E-Cigarettes: Power Units Being Recalled Due to Dangerous Fire Risk

R.J. Reynolds Co. has issued a massive safety recall of approximately 2.6 million power units for its brand of Vuse Vibe electronic cigarettes.

The nationwide recall was released last week following numerous consumer reports that battery malfunction was causing power units to overheat, posing a potentially injurious fire risk.

While no injuries have yet to be reported, R.J. Reynolds Co. has recommended that owners of the Vuse Brand of electronic cigarettes discontinue use of the product and (furthermore) that users refrain from charging the power units.

If you or someone you know has been injured by a Vuse e-cigarette power unit malfunction, please do not hesitate to contact Inserra Kelley Sewell, Personal Injury Attorneys. Our compassionate and competent team of legal professionals are dedicated to providing you with answers about your potential claim.

Self-Driving Cars Could Be Putting You at Risk as Their Numbers—and Their Shortcomings—Continue to Grow

A self-driving Uber vehicle—with a human safety driver behind the wheel in case of emergency—struck and killed an Arizona woman on Sunday, March 18, 2018. The victim, identified as 49-year-old Elaine Herzberg, is the first known pedestrian fatality caused by an autonomous vehicle.

According to preliminary reports, the self-driving vehicle was traveling approximately 40 mph in a 35 mph zone. At the moment of impact, the vehicle was in autonomous mode and did not slow down prior to the collision. (Autonomous mode means that the vehicle was driving on its own at the time the crash occurred. A human safety driver sat behind the wheel as a precaution.) The unsuspecting pedestrian was walking along the crosswalk with her bicycle when she was struck by the self-driving Uber SUV. The human safety driver exhibited no signs of impairment following the tragic collision. The accident occurred at night (at approximately 10:00 PM) and no inclement weather was involved.

Herzberg’s death is an ominous reminder that self-driving technology is still in its infancy. Meanwhile, state governments are grappling with how to best regulate robotic car testing while posing minimal risk to the public. However, the clock is clicking towards 2020 as driverless car related injuries, accidents, and fatalities continue to mount. 2020—it is the year purported to be the timeframe of large-scale deployment of self-driving vehicles on American roads.

Uber is not the only company experimenting with driverless technology. Google, Samsung, Volvo, Tesla, and BMW—just to name a few—are among a burgeoning list of tech companies and automakers that are exploring and actively testing driverless vehicles on the roads right now (particularly in states like Arizona and California where inclement weather is less of a concern and there are less regulatory hurdles to overcome). Earlier this March, Arizona Governor Doug Ducey revised an executive order allowing self-driving vehicles to drive on state roads without a safety test driver behind the wheel. California is poised to follow suit in April by also allowing companies to test vehicles on the road without a person in the driver’s seat.

As companies, like Uber, race to create the safest and most advanced autopilot technology, vulnerable road users—such as pedestrians, cyclists, vehicle drivers and their passengers—are at risk of colliding with robotic vehicles that fall short of their expectation to adjust for the volatility, complexity, and unpredictability of the human driving experience. Can artificial intelligence really be taught—as human drivers are—to account for every possible instance in which human lives are at stake? Can such a safety automotive wonder ever really be entrusted to respond with the same speed and pragmatism that the human mind possesses?

While the answers to these questions are elusive, it is important to contemplate not just how your life—but the lives of your loved ones—could be jeopardized by a growing industry of self-operating vehicles that tech companies and automakers worldwide envision to assume control of the roads in mass numbers over the decades to come.

If you or someone you know has been injured by a self-driving vehicle, please do not hesitate to contact Inserra Kelley Sewell, Personal Injury Attorneys. Our compassionate and competent team of legal professionals are dedicated to providing you with answers about your potential claim. At Inserra Kelley Sewell, your health, safety, and peace of mind are the reason we do what we do. Let us help you and keep you driving safely as the list of potential road dangers becomes more daunting and driverless vehicles prepare to inherit the road in droves.

Popular Dog Foods Found to Contain Euthanasia Drug

Recently, this firm put out a first ever informational blog to let readers know that their beloved dogs could be in jeopardy due to the dog food they are consuming.  Already, there is another instance impacting the beloved canine members of the family, so we wanted to get the word out again for our readership.  The  U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has done an investigation with findings that popular brands of dog food contain a euthanasia drug!  Smuckers owns the brands with the dog food brands and has already voluntarily withdrawn the products.  The brands are Gravy Train, Skippy, Ol’ Roy, and Kibbles ‘N Bits.  A large number of stores, including 4,700 Walmart stores, are pulling the dog foods from their shelves.   

Current standards for dog food labels do not make it likely that pet owners will know what is truly being fed to their beloved furry friends.  Smuckers was violating federal law that does not allow any level of euthanasia drug, pentobarbital, to be included in a pet food product.  Smuckers is not answering questions on how the drug got into their dog foods, leaving investigators to wonder whether the manufacturer is using dogs for its food that have been euthanized with the drug.  Until the company answers questions, this is what some would assume and that’s a very unpleasant possibility for the pet owner to take in.  The bottom line is that consumers return any of these brands they have in their home to the store where it was purchased, and that their personal veterinarian be contacted for dogs that have already consumed the product. 

Inserra Kelley Sewell, Personal Injury Attorneys, strives to keep its readership aware of potential dangers to themselves and their loved ones in this society ripe with product dangers and recalls.  In this case the danger is to the beloved furry member of your family. Do not hesitate to contact this firm for advice on possible avenues to compensation.         

Salmonella Health Alert With Fareway Chicken Salad

There is a new alert out from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) on Salmonella dangers with chicken salad made and distributed by Fareway grocery stores based in Iowa.  Fareway distributed the subject chicken salad, made between December 15, 2017 to February 13, 2018, to their out of state locations as well as those in Iowa.  This includes Iowa, Nebraska, South Dakota, Minnesota, and Illinois Fareway stores.  Illnesses have been reported of Salmonella infection, which can include what is called Reactive Arthritis and/or Irritable Bowel Syndrome.  The most common symptoms with foodborne Salmonella illness includes diarrhea, abdominal cramps, elevated fever 12 to 72 hours after consumption, and these symptoms can be severe and cause the need for the consumer to be hospitalized.  As in many illness, there are populations especially vulnerable for more severe reactions, such as the elderly, people with suppressed immune systems, and young children/infants.  Salmonella infection generally lasts 4 to 7 days and most people do recover, barring complications. 

Consumers with any size deli container holding Fareway chicken salad, of various weights, should not consume the product, according to the FSIS and Iowa Department of Health.  It is recommended the product be thrown away or returned to the Fareway where it was purchased, and if you or a loved one has consumed the product, contact your medical provider immediately.  Do not hesitate to contact Inserra Kelley Sewell, Personal Injury Attorneys where our compassionate professionals can advise whether you may be entitled to compensation for your injuries.           

Johnson & Johnson Will Pay Millions for Metal on Metal Hip Implants

Inserra Kelley Sewell has given its readership information in the past on the defective Pinnacle metal on metal replacement, with currently more than 9,000 cases filed against Johnson & Johnson and DePuy. A test case recently saw a jury award in Texas for six individual plaintiffs in the amount of $247 million dollars. This test trial was the third straight win for plaintiffs with injuries from the metal-on- metal hip replacements, which Johnson & Johnston and Depuy failed to warn consumer patients about. Individuals injured by the hip device implants suffered problems such as tissue death, bone erosion, and other injuries.

Johnson & Johnson has already vowed to appeal the process and Depuy has made the statement they will defend themselves in these lawsuits for the long-term. Depuy continues to claim the hip implants are effective, as per strong clinical data. Plaintiffs in these cases, however, contend they were not warned of the risks and the defendant companies hawk their metal-on- metal products by stating they are longer lasting than plastic or ceramic implants and commonly utilized in treatment.

Be a well-informed consumer and ask your doctor about whether you could be affected. If you or a loved one has already suffered damages from the Pinnacle metal-on- metal hip implants, do not hesitate to bring questions regarding your personal situation and possible claim to the caring legal experts at Inserra Kelley Sewell, where your health and safety is priority one.

Ford Fusion Steering Wheels May Loosen and Detach

In automotive defect news, the traffic and safety regulating powers that be in the United States and looking into the possibility that the steering wheels in 2014 to 2016 Ford Fusions could possibly loosen up and even detach.  The probe began once there were three reports of this problem.  One particular report involved a Fusion owner complaining that they were turning their 2015 Ford Fusion when their steering wheel fell into their lap.  There are about 841,000 Ford Fusions as the subject of this investigation and there is no word yet on the results.  It has been stated that Ford is working with investigators and wants owners to know they can talk to local dealers about any concerns in their Fusion.      

If you own a Ford Fusion from years 2014 to 2016, do not hesitate to contact your local dealer, especially if you have experienced the loosening or even detachment problem in your car.   If you believe you or a loved one has already been injured or worse due to an auto defect, do not hesitate to contact the professionals at Inserra & Kelley Law Offices to see if you may be entitled to compensation. 

Fisher Price Motion Seats Recalled for Fire Hazard

Motion seats have become an exceedingly popular tool in the toolbox of parents wishing to keep their sweet babies content.  Fisher Price has had to recall 63,000 of their soothing motion seats for four different models.  There is a danger of overheating covers for the motors in the products that could cause a fire.  At least one of the reported defective motion seats did start a fire, and at least 36 motion seats have been reported as overheated. 

The models include Fisher Prices’s  Soothing Motions Seats and Smart Connect Soothing Motions Seats.  The models for the Soothing Motions Seats are CMR35, CMR36, CMR37, and DYH22.  The model for the Smart Connect model is CMR39.  The number can be found under the motor house and it is recommended that owners of the models contact Fisher Price for a refund or replacement.   

If you or a loved one owns one of the subject Fisher Price motion seats and have suffered injuries because of overheating or fire, do not hesitate to contact Inserra | Kelley | Sewell  for compassionate expertise concerning whether you may be entitled to compensation for injuries.